Closed sbmlsecretary closed 2 years ago
Original comment by: lenov
Logged In: YES user_id=343670 Originator: NO
I am accepting this issue as valid.
Original comment by: mhucka
Logged In: YES user_id=862059 Originator: NO
I am accepting this issue as valid.
Original comment by: shoops
Logged In: YES user_id=641982 Originator: NO
I agree with the proposed change and that it should be done.
Original comment by: sarahkeating
Logged In: YES user_id=862059 Originator: NO
I agree with the proposed change and that it should be done.
Original comment by: shoops
Logged In: YES user_id=343670 Originator: NO
I agree that the change should not be taken.
Original comment by: mhucka
Logged In: YES user_id=343670 Originator: NO
Sorry, ignore the previous comment; I pulled down the wrong thing in the canned response list.
Original comment by: mhucka
Logged In: YES user_id=343670 Originator: NO
I agree with the proposed change and that it should be done.
Original comment by: mhucka
Original comment by: lenov
L2V2r1 page 78 line 20
Following the discussion in Yokohama, the attribute sboTerm of a "reaction" should contain the ID of an SBO term belonging to the event vocabulary and not the modelling framework vocabulary.
1) the modelling framework is already pointed to from the term itself
2) it would permit to link SBML to SBGN and BioPAX
This change does not imply a schema modification. We need to do it quickly in order to allow Sarah to write the validation rule.
Reported by: lenov
Original Ticket: "sbml/sbml-specifications//38":https://sourceforge.net/p/sbml/sbml-specifications//38