search

sbmlsecretary / test-sbml-specifications

Test repo for transferring issues.
0 stars 0 forks source link

Shouldn't there be enclosure rules for x-dim. compartments? #53

Closed sbmlsecretary closed 2 years ago

sbmlsecretary commented 16 years ago

Chris Myers recently asked:

> 8) There is a rule that says a 0-dim compartment should not be outside > any compartment but a 0-dim compartment. It would make sense to me to > also have a rule that says that a 1-dim compartment can only be outside > a 0 or 1-dim compartment and a 2-dim can only be outside 2, 1, or 0 dim > compartments.

Should such rules in fact exist?

MH

Reported by: mhucka

Original Ticket: "sbml/sbml-specifications//110":https://sourceforge.net/p/sbml/sbml-specifications//110

sbmlsecretary commented 16 years ago

Original comment by: lenov

sbmlsecretary commented 16 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=1045203 Originator: NO

No, such rules should not exist. A sphere (2D) is outside a ball (3D) => membrane and vesicle.

Original comment by: lenov

sbmlsecretary commented 16 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=862059 Originator: NO

If I would have it my way the outside attribute should be removed. SBO and structured annotation are far better methods to carry the semantics than the outside attribute.

But since we have the attribute outside and additionally we all agree that this attribute does not have any impact on the mathematical interpretation of a model any rules applied to it are meaningless.

Original comment by: shoops

sbmlsecretary commented 16 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=862059 Originator: NO

I am accepting this issue as valid.

Original comment by: shoops

sbmlsecretary commented 16 years ago

Original comment by: mhucka