A challenge is that we would like to prepend the file: scheme for local paths. However, there were issues with making this work properly with the persists option. @imagejan can explain this better.
If we cannot find a good solution for automatically prepending the "file:", maybe we could also consider just not doing it.
It is important that down-stream code can deal with the URI. I wrote here some code to see whether one could live without the "file:" and it seems to be possible. Basically, the pattern would be that one defaults to "file:" whenever one cannot identify the scheme. Maybe that is fair?
Hi @imagejan et al.,
A challenge is that we would like to prepend the
file:
scheme for local paths. However, there were issues with making this work properly with thepersists
option. @imagejan can explain this better.If we cannot find a good solution for automatically prepending the "file:", maybe we could also consider just not doing it.
It is important that down-stream code can deal with the URI. I wrote here some code to see whether one could live without the "file:" and it seems to be possible. Basically, the pattern would be that one defaults to "file:" whenever one cannot identify the scheme. Maybe that is fair?