We do support l and L for 4-byte ints, but not i and I. I think the latter are the more appropriate as they're always 4 bytes, whereas the former can sometimes be 8 bytes.
There is also potentially a clash between i as a struct-like code and i meaning unsigned int to worry about.
We do support
l
andL
for 4-byte ints, but noti
andI
. I think the latter are the more appropriate as they're always 4 bytes, whereas the former can sometimes be 8 bytes.There is also potentially a clash between
i
as astruct
-like code andi
meaning unsigned int to worry about.See #339 for some more context.