There are plenty of network devices based on FreeBSD. pfSence and OPNSence are primary example. Not to mention that support for pure FreeBSD box will increase potential install base and open way to use it on Apple MACs ( this will be complicated).
Big problem with FreeBSD is lack of single implementation of WireGuard protocol. There are 2 exists
1) User-space written on ruby and available for all versions
2) Kernel module which after pfSence drama failed to get to to latest version of FreeBSD , but eventually will be there.
Both versions are using same set of userspace tools.
So implementation for 1 will give better immediate coverage, option 2 is future proof.
If you can make code to work under FreeBSD I will happily package it for you.
There are plenty of network devices based on FreeBSD. pfSence and OPNSence are primary example. Not to mention that support for pure FreeBSD box will increase potential install base and open way to use it on Apple MACs ( this will be complicated).
Big problem with FreeBSD is lack of single implementation of WireGuard protocol. There are 2 exists 1) User-space written on ruby and available for all versions 2) Kernel module which after pfSence drama failed to get to to latest version of FreeBSD , but eventually will be there.
Both versions are using same set of userspace tools.
So implementation for 1 will give better immediate coverage, option 2 is future proof.
If you can make code to work under FreeBSD I will happily package it for you.