Open lionlanlan opened 5 months ago
The following command you are using is wrong:
admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/jffs#nexutil -Ieth6 -s20 -b -l34 -vm+ABEQAAAgCOfDYKIYywpGCXLCgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA==
As described in the README the correct format would be:
nexutil -Ieth6 -s500 -b -l34 -vm+ABEQAAAgCOfDYKIYywpGCXLCgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA==
The following command you are using is wrong:
admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/jffs#nexutil -Ieth6 -s20 -b -l34 -vm+ABEQAAAgCOfDYKIYywpGCXLCgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA==
As described in the README the correct format would be:
nexutil -Ieth6 -s500 -b -l34 -vm+ABEQAAAgCOfDYKIYywpGCXLCgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA==
yes I noticed it but if I set the s to 500: admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/tmp/home/root# ifconfig eth6 up admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/tmp/home/root# nexutil -Ieth6 -s500 -b -l34 -vm+ABEQAAAgCO fDYKIYywpGCXLCgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA== __nex_driver_io: error ret=-1 errno=95
Maybe you haven't loaded the nexmon_csi
patched firmware.
You can check with nexutil -Ieth6 -V | grep -ic nexmon
. If this produces 0
, you haven't loaded the nexmon_csi
firmware. If that is the case, you can load it with /sbin/rmmod dhd; /sbin/insmod /jffs/dhd.ko
. Afterwards, you need to configure the interface again.
Maybe you haven't loaded the
nexmon_csi
patched firmware. You can check withnexutil -Ieth6 -V | grep -ic nexmon
. If this produces0
, you haven't loaded thenexmon_csi
firmware. If that is the case, you can load it with/sbin/rmmod dhd; /sbin/insmod /jffs/dhd.ko
. Afterwards, you need to configure the interface again.
Sorry for reply late. We tried the nexutil -Ieth6 -V | grep -ic nexmon and actually produced 0. then we load it with /sbin/rmmod dhd; /sbin/insmod /jffs/dhd.ko,but: admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# rmmod dhd admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# insmod /jffs/dhd.ko admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# nexutil -Ieth6 -s500 -b -l34 -vm+ABEQAAAgCO fDYKIYywpGCXLCgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA== -sh: nexutil: not found admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# export PATH=$PATH:/jffs admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# nexutil -Ieth6 -s500 -b -l34 -vm+ABEQAAAgCO fDYKIYywpGCXLCgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA== __nex_driver_io: error ret=-1 errno=95
Maybe you haven't loaded the
nexmon_csi
patched firmware. You can check withnexutil -Ieth6 -V | grep -ic nexmon
. If this produces0
, you haven't loaded thenexmon_csi
firmware. If that is the case, you can load it with/sbin/rmmod dhd; /sbin/insmod /jffs/dhd.ko
. Afterwards, you need to configure the interface again.
hi,now I can run this command successfully nexutil -Ieth6 -s500 -b -l34 -vm+ABEQAAAgCOfDYKIYywpGCXLCgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA== but nexutil -Ieth6 -V | grep -ic nexmon still produces 0.
What does nexutil -Ieth6 -V
produce?
What does
nexutil -Ieth6 -V
produce?
here is nexutil -Ieth6 -V produce: admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/jffs# nexutil -Ieth6 -V firmware 10.10.122.20 (r683106) FWID 01-9ac67028 vendorid 0x14e4 deviceid 0x43c5 radiorev 0x2103eb chipnum 0xaa90 chiprev 0x4 chippackage 0x0 corerev 0x41 boardid 0x798 boardvendor 0x14e4 boardrev P102 driverrev 0xa0a7a14 ucoderev 0x46843fd bus 0x0 phytype 0xb phyrev 0x21 anarev 0x0 nvramrev 0x0
platform | firmware | vendorid | deviceid | radiorev | chipnum | chiprev | chippackage | corerev | boardid | boardvendor | boardrev | driverrev | ucoderev | bus | phytype | phyrev | anarev | nvramrev |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
unknown | 10.10.122.20 (r683106) FWID 01-9ac67028 | 0x14e4 | 0x43c5 | 0x2103eb | 0xaa90 | 0x4 | 0x0 | 0x41 | 0x798 | 0x14e4 | P102 | 0xa0a7a14 | 0x46843fd | 0x0 | 0xb | 0x21 | 0x0 | 0x0 |
and another command get this: admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# dmesg | grep 10.10.122.20 CONSOLE: RTE (PCIE-MSG_BUF) 10.10.122.20 (r683106) on BCM43666 r4 @ 40.0/200.0/800.0MHz CONSOLE: 026738.763 10.10.122.20 (nexmon.org/csi: fdb2-14) CONSOLE: RTE (PCIE-MSG_BUF) 10.10.122.20 (r683106) on BCM43664 r4 @ 40.0/200.0/800.0MHz CONSOLE: 026738.774 10.10.122.20 (nexmon.org/csi: fdb2-14)
all my steps are: admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/tmp/home/root# cd /sbin/ admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# rmmod dhd admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# insmod /jffs/dhd.ko admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# dmesg | grep 10.10.122.20 CONSOLE: RTE (PCIE-MSG_BUF) 10.10.122.20 (r683106) on BCM43666 r4 @ 40.0/200.0/800.0MHz CONSOLE: 026738.763 10.10.122.20 (nexmon.org/csi: fdb2-14) CONSOLE: RTE (PCIE-MSG_BUF) 10.10.122.20 (r683106) on BCM43664 r4 @ 40.0/200.0/800.0MHz CONSOLE: 026738.774 10.10.122.20 (nexmon.org/csi: fdb2-14) admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# wl -i eth6 up admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# wl -i eth6 radio on admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# wl -i eth6 country US admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# ifconfig eth6 up admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# cd admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/tmp/home/root# cd /jffs/ admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/jffs# nexutil -Ieth6 -s500 -b -l34 -vm+ABEQAAAgCOfDYKIYywp GCXLCgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA== admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/jffs# nexutil -Ieth6 -V
Ok, so apparently we do not overwrite this value, sorry for the confusion.
Anyways, the filtered output of dmesg
confirms that you have loaded the correct firmware:
admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/sbin# dmesg | grep 10.10.122.20
CONSOLE: RTE (PCIE-MSG_BUF) 10.10.122.20 (r683106) on BCM43666 r4 @ 40.0/200.0/800.0MHz
CONSOLE: 026738.763 10.10.122.20 (nexmon.org/csi: fdb2-14)
CONSOLE: RTE (PCIE-MSG_BUF) 10.10.122.20 (r683106) on BCM43664 r4 @ 40.0/200.0/800.0MHz
CONSOLE: 026738.774 10.10.122.20 (nexmon.org/csi: fdb2-14)
Also, there seems to be no error when you execute
admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/jffs# nexutil -Ieth6 -s500 -b -l34 -vm+ABEQAAAgCOfDYKIYywpGCXLCgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA==
Which means, you have configured the CSI extractor.
To extract CSI you are missing one more step, activation of monitor mode: /usr/sbin/wl -i eth6 monitor 1
(Please check the README again!)
Hi, When I tried to capture CSI, I encountered the same error and was able to solve the error with the help of the solution here. However, after that tcpdump -i wlan0 dst port 5500 When I run this, I get Permission denied error. Please let me know if you have a solution.
You have to execute this on the router.
Thanks for the reply. I run this on my router and get this error.
On the router there is no interface called wlan0
. Please head back to the README and read it carefully.
Thanks for the reply. I tried eth6, eth4, etc. and got the same error.
tcpdump
is not installed by default on the router, have you cross-compiled it correctly?
See this post for more info: https://github.com/seemoo-lab/nexmon_csi/issues/34#issuecomment-577374225
I thought I had cross-compiled correctly, but maybe I did not. I will try again later and get back to you. Thank you very much.
Hi, I just tried it and I get the same error.
admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# ls dhd.ko iperf3 nexutil nmp_cl_json.js nmp_client_list syslog.log tcpdump admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# wl -i eth6 up admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# wl -i eth6 radio on admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# wl -i eth6 chanspec 161/80 Chanspec set to 0xe39b admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# wl -i eth6 monitor 1 admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# ifconfig eth6 up admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# tcpdump -i eth6 -v dst port 5500 -sh: tcpdump: not found admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# . /tcpdump -i eth6 -v dst port 5500 -sh: . /tcpdump: Permission denied
This is what I have run. Thank you very much.
Have you even set execution rights on tcpdump
? If not:
chmod u+x /jffs/tcpdump
This may not be running. Do I just run it on my PC?
No, on the router.
Okay, I will try it. Thanks for the reply.
I ran the above command and successfully ran tcpdump. Thank you very much. However, it seems that no packets are being captured.
admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# . /nexutil -Ieth6 -s500 -b -l34 -vm+MBEQGIAQAE1MRDyLgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA== admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# wl -i eth6 up admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# wl -i eth6 radio on admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# wl -i eth6 chanspec 161/80 Chanspec set to 0xe39b admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# wl -i eth6 monitor 1 admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# ifconfig eth6 up admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# . /tcpdump -i eth6 -v dst port 5500 -w ~/pcap/1.pcap -c 1000 tcpdump: WARNING: eth6: no IPv4 address assigned tcpdump: /root/pcap/1.pcap: No such file or directory admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# . /tcpdump -i eth6 -v dst port 5500 -w /tmp/1.pcap -c 1000 tcpdump: WARNING: eth6: no IPv4 address assigned tcpdump: listening on eth6, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes ^C0 packets captured 0 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel
I don't know what is causing this. Thank you in advance.
eth6 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 04:D4:C4:43:C8:BC
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:5545 errors:0 dropped:6 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:1604105 (1.5 MiB) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
This is the result of running ifconfig.
eth6 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 04:D4:C4:43:C8:BC
inet addr:192.168.50.100 Bcast:192.168.50.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:5549 errors:0 dropped:7 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:23 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:1605243 (1.5 MiB) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
The result was the same when I ran it with the ip address assigned in this way.
admin@RT-AC86U:/jffs# . /tcpdump -i eth6 -v Thus, if we did not specify the port, we were able to capture it. Does this not allow me to get CSI?
Greetings, I have passed all steps on getting started and now try to capture packet from 149/80 channel(We use two other machine transport packet on this channel) but get nothing after running a long time.
makecsiparams -c 149/80 -C 1 -N 1 -m 8e:7c:36:a:21:8c,b0:a4:60:97:2c:28 admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/jffs#export PATH=$PATH:/jffs admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/jffs#ifconfig eth6 up admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/jffs#nexutil -Ieth6 -s20 -b -l34 -vm+ABEQAAAgCOfDYKIYywpGCXLCgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA== admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/jffs#usr/sbin/wl -i eth6 monitor 1 admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/jffs# tcpdump -i eth6 dst port 5500 tcpdump: WARNING: eth6: no IPv4 address assigned tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on eth6, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes ^C 0 packets captured 6 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel
and if I skip the dst port, like admin@RT-AC86U-5360:/jffs# tcpdump -i eth6 I can successfully capture a lot of packets, however, I cannot find where the captured packets are and do not sure they are what I want.