search

semanticClimate / automated-literature-review

Automated Literature Review (ALS) using pyami software with Jupyter Notebooks
https://github.com/orgs/semanticClimate/discussions/9
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Project description and workflow diagram #5

Open mrchristian opened 2 months ago

mrchristian commented 2 months ago

See draft:

Doc - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IhepOyiaVzdsEmMBQo-Wr_6jli33pq8EKAorksVFWCE/edit

Workflow diagram - https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1kSLXr3t88sO6VkikR7aPKzq_5FGpAD2Wt2X_T5QOoDw/edit

mrchristian commented 2 months ago

Please give feedback on the project description and workflow diagram

neerajkumaris commented 2 months ago

I find the project description clear, promising, and easy to understand, particularly with prior knowledge of terms such as "phygetpapers" and "Jupyter notebook"." However, I acknowledge that for someone encountering these terms for the first time, clarity might be lacking. To address this, I suggest incorporating direct links within the description to provide additional context and help users understand these terms better. However, if the project description is solely intended for team members who are already familiar with these terms and tools, then it serves its purpose well. Furthermore, the inclusion of a workflow diagram adds to the clarity of the project description, presenting the process in an easy-to-follow and concise manner.

ydv-amit-ydv commented 2 months ago

I hope that by creating these self explanatory Jupyter Notebook resources for automated literature reviews using the Ami software, we can facilitate broader adoption of this approach within the research community. The scoping literature review process using open access scholarly literature can serve various purposes, including providing an introduction to a subject, identifying key vocabulary, highlighting major contributors, and tracking developments evolution over time.

With the Jupyter Notebook setup, users can engage in 'zero-install' usage directly in the browser, circumventing complex local installation issues. The concise guide to resources will offer valuable support to users navigating this automated review process. This project embraces open science principles, and can possible assure reproducibility and transparency throughout the workflow.

ydv-amit-ydv commented 2 months ago

Sir, As of the workflow I would suggest certain changes kindly recheck the ALR workflow Link to ALR workflow, if deemed fissile kindly accept them, or else revert back. The changes are : (addition of blocks)