Closed GorgonMeducer closed 6 years ago
Catridge implementation is quite hacky at the moment - it's somehow filling the gaps but is not really structured. As soon as other mappers than #0 are implemented this will have a rework and this should also add the 2kB for four screen mirroring. Mapper #0 isn't supporting four screen mirroring, is it?
So far, from your implementation, I don’t even find a room for the extra 2K RAM. I ask this because next step, I will optimise ppu aggressively (rather than equivilant refactory), this new optimisation requiring buffers for all the physical name tables.
Should we separate the two ppu implementations? Having two files will be easier as soon as ppu implementation is differing a lot. When compiling in your project you could just choose your ppu implementation.
Separate two files will be a good idea. I will find a proper chance to do that. My next pull request is still an equivalent refactory.
It looks like we don’t support Four-screen mirroring uses an additional 2 KB of RAM in the cartridge itself to allow logical name tables to each map to separate physical name tables. Do we have plan?