Draft a workflow showing how date of priority is determined by ICNP and how it should be treated to resolve priority issues between ICNP and SeqCode names.
GTDB will take care of this as part of the species clustering pipeline.
Therefore, once GTDB get an idea how to get the dates and times for the ICNP names published after 2022, we should be able to implement a similar wf for the registry where users can quickly resolve priorities conflicts (smth like an extra tool that can be part of the Useful Links on the main page).
The date and time of the name published in IJSEM needs to be processed for this. Validation lists include sequence numbers to determine the priority, if the sequence number is the same - one need to check the order of the name in the original ms. This is manual part of the work. But the reference from the validation list can be given to access it faster via the registry. Comes down convincing IJSEM to give an access to the record and not to their lists in the journal...I will try to involve both IJSEM and LPSN since the latter have money and can maintain a db for them...
Draft a workflow showing how date of priority is determined by ICNP and how it should be treated to resolve priority issues between ICNP and SeqCode names.
GTDB will take care of this as part of the species clustering pipeline. Therefore, once GTDB get an idea how to get the dates and times for the ICNP names published after 2022, we should be able to implement a similar wf for the registry where users can quickly resolve priorities conflicts (smth like an extra tool that can be part of the Useful Links on the main page).
The date and time of the name published in IJSEM needs to be processed for this. Validation lists include sequence numbers to determine the priority, if the sequence number is the same - one need to check the order of the name in the original ms. This is manual part of the work. But the reference from the validation list can be given to access it faster via the registry. Comes down convincing IJSEM to give an access to the record and not to their lists in the journal...I will try to involve both IJSEM and LPSN since the latter have money and can maintain a db for them...