search

seraphis-migration / wallet3

Info and discussions about a hypothetical full 'wallet2' rewrite from scratch
MIT License
13 stars 0 forks source link

What's the name of our project? #15

Open rbrunner7 opened 2 years ago

rbrunner7 commented 2 years ago

Seems to me we should soon agree on a name of the project at hand, building a wallet2 successor to support Seraphis and Jamtis. If only for such mundane things like naming repositories, naming the new folder in the Monero source code tree for that wallet, and similar.

This repository here where the issues are located so far is called wallet3. When I created it a few months ago I used that merely as a "working title". But anyway, with the existing wallet called wallet2, wallet3 of course is natural to derive. So it's one candidate for a project name.

We have now a Seraphis library, written by @UkoeHB. This also leads quite naturally to a project name of Seraphis wallet. More descriptive than wallet3, but also quite a bit longer.

I am not sure that unrelated names like e.g. Wallet NG with "NG" standing for "next generation" are a good way to go, but other people may have a different opinion.

Please voice your opinion, and let your own proposals flow!

UkoeHB commented 2 years ago

Longer is not a bad thing, I think seraphis_wallet is a good term, at least temporarily (or sp_wallet).

DangerousFreedom1984 commented 2 years ago

I agree with koe. Almost all the domain names in the seraphis lib start with sp. We could name the wallet just Seraphis Wallet and if we need domain separators we could use spw.

One-horse-wagon commented 2 years ago

It is a bit confusing having two big names--Jamtis and Seraphis. Paring it down to just Seraphis wallet would be my vote.