Closed GIJack closed 2 years ago
Hello Jack,
GI Jack:
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
- wait == 1 case since in that case write_inode() functions do
- sync_dirty_buffer() and thus effectively write one block at a time. / -static int __sync_filesystem(struct super_block sb, int wait) +int __sync_filesystem(struct super_block *sb, int wait) { if (wait) sync_inodes_sb(sb);
The original file upstream already has removed the static, so this patch fails.
tested with kernel 5.15.36
Thanks for the report. Confirmed that v5.15.36 has 4b7617ae04de 2022-04-27 fs: remove __sync_filesystem which is a backport from v5.16 9a208ba5c9af 2021-10-22 fs: remove __sync_filesystem
As you might know, aufs5.16/aufs5-base.patch already addressed it. Now I am going to create aufs5.15.36 branch and release it on next Monday.
J. R. Okajima
righteous
------- Blind-Carbon-Copy
From: "J. R. Okajima" @.> To: @. Subject: aufs5 GIT release (v5.15.36 and v5.18-rc5) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: @.> Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 08:47:49 +0900 Message-ID: @.>
o news aufs5.15.36 branch is released. aufs5.x-rcN is updated to follow linux-v5.18-rc5, but aufs code is unchanged
J. R. Okajima
------- End of Blind-Carbon-Copy
thanks, works now
aufs5-base.patch:
The original file upstream already has removed the static, so this patch fails.
tested with kernel 5.15.36