🚀 Here's the PR! #19

See Sweep's progress at the progress dashboard!

⚡ Sweep Basic Tier: I'm using GPT-4. You have 2 GPT-4 tickets left for the month and 0 for the day. (tracking ID: 34daef0987)

For more GPT-4 tickets, visit our payment portal. For a one week free trial, try Sweep Pro (unlimited GPT-4 tickets).

[!TIP] I'll email you at michael.gruen9@gmail.com when I complete this pull request!

Actions (click)

[ ] ↻ Restart Sweep

Sandbox execution failed

The sandbox appears to be unavailable or down.

Step 1: 🔎 Searching

I found the following snippets in your repository. I will now analyze these snippets and come up with a plan.

Some code snippets I think are relevant in decreasing order of relevance (click to expand). If some file is missing from here, you can mention the path in the ticket description.

https://github.com/shadowaxe99/creator-Econ/blob/ff5dd29227ddea446c9bacada9e8ca6d7c4e4016/server/app/tests/test_api.py#L8-L67 https://github.com/shadowaxe99/creator-Econ/blob/ff5dd29227ddea446c9bacada9e8ca6d7c4e4016/server/app/utils/validators.py#L1-L22

Step 2: ⌨️ Coding

[X] Modify server/app/tests/test_api.py ✓ https://github.com/shadowaxe99/creator-Econ/commit/6ff994a4641d1973883b0ac6093dfe9811830645 Edit
Modify server/app/tests/test_api.py with contents:
• Add more test cases to cover more scenarios and edge cases. For example, add a test case to check the response when an invalid asset ID or blockchain address is provided.
• Enhance the existing test cases if necessary. For example, in the `test_purchase_asset` test case, check if the asset is marked as sold not only in the database but also in the response data.
• Make sure to use the `setUp` method to set up the necessary data for each test case and the `tearDown` method to clean up the data after each test case.

--- 
+++ 
@@ -41,9 +41,10 @@
         self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
         self.assertTrue('Purchase successful' in response.get_data(as_text=True))

-        # Check if the asset is marked as sold
+        # Check if the asset is marked as sold in both the database and response data
         asset = Asset.query.get('1')
         self.assertTrue(asset.is_sold)
+        self.assertIn('is_sold', response.get_json())

     def test_purchase_nonexistent_asset(self):
         response = self.client.post('/api/assets/999/purchase', json={
@@ -51,6 +52,22 @@
             'buyer_address': '0xMockAddress'
         })
         self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 404)
+
+    def test_purchase_with_invalid_asset_id(self):
+        # Test invalid asset ID
+        response = self.client.post('/api/assets/invalid/purchase', json={
+            'asset_id': 'invalid',
+            'buyer_address': '0xMockAddress'
+        })
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 400)
+
+    def test_purchase_with_invalid_buyer_address(self):
+        # Test invalid blockchain address
+        response = self.client.post('/api/assets/1/purchase', json={
+            'asset_id': '1',
+            'buyer_address': ''
+        })
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 400)

     def test_purchase_already_sold_asset(self):
         # Mark the asset as sold

[X] Modify server/app/utils/validators.py ✓ https://github.com/shadowaxe99/creator-Econ/commit/ddaa7364e6c714d7a70fb6d3106785c7f7043032 Edit
Modify server/app/utils/validators.py with contents:
• Enhance the existing validation functions if necessary. For example, in the `is_valid_asset_id` function, check if the asset ID exists in the database in addition to checking the format.
• Add new validation functions as needed for other data types. For example, add a function to validate the price of an asset if it is required in the future.
• Make sure to return meaningful error messages in the validation functions so that the user can understand what went wrong if the validation fails.

--- 
+++ 
@@ -3,13 +3,24 @@
 from typing import Optional
 from app.database.models import Asset

-def is_valid_asset_id(asset_id: str) -> bool:
-    """Validate the asset ID format."""
-    return bool(re.match(r'^[0-9a-fA-F]{24}$', asset_id))
+def is_valid_asset_price(price: float) -> str:
+    """Validate the asset price."""
+    # For future implementation
+    return ''

-def is_valid_address(address: str) -> bool:
+def is_valid_asset_id(asset_id: str) -> str:
+    """Validate the asset ID format and existence."""
+    if not re.match(r'^[0-9a-f]{24}$', asset_id):
+        return 'Invalid asset ID format.'
+    if not Asset.query.get(asset_id):
+        return 'Asset ID does not exist.'
+    return ''
+
+def is_valid_address(address: str) -> str:
     """Validate the blockchain address format."""
-    return bool(re.match(r'^0x[a-fA-F0-9]{40}$', address))
+    if not re.match(r'^0x[a-f0-9]{40}$', address):
+        return 'Invalid blockchain address format.'
+    return ''

 def get_asset_by_id(asset_id: str) -> Optional[Asset]:
     """Retrieve an asset by its ID if it exists and is not sold."""
@@ -18,7 +29,15 @@
         return asset
     return None

-def validate_purchase_request(asset_id: str, buyer_address: str) -> bool:
-    """Validate the purchase request data."""
-    return is_valid_asset_id(asset_id) and is_valid_address(buyer_address) and get_asset_by_id(asset_id) is not None
+def validate_purchase_request(asset_id: str, buyer_address: str) -> str:
+    """Validate the purchase request data and return an error message if invalid."""
+    error_message = is_valid_asset_id(asset_id)
+    if error_message:
+        return error_message
+    error_message = is_valid_address(buyer_address)
+    if error_message:
+        return error_message
+    if get_asset_by_id(asset_id) is None:
+        return 'Asset is not available.'
+    return ''
 ```

Step 3: 🔁 Code Review

I have finished reviewing the code for completeness. I did not find errors for sweep/_7.

🎉 Latest improvements to Sweep:

We just released a dashboard to track Sweep's progress on your issue in real-time, showing every stage of the process – from search to planning and coding.
Sweep uses OpenAI's latest Assistant API to plan code changes and modify code! This is 3x faster and significantly more reliable as it allows Sweep to edit code and validate the changes in tight iterations, the same way as a human would.
Try using the GitHub issues extension to create Sweep issues directly from your editor! GitHub Issues and Pull Requests.

💡 To recreate the pull request edit the issue title or description. To tweak the pull request, leave a comment on the pull request. ^{Join Our Discord}

shadowaxe99 / creator-Econ

Sweep: #15

Details