algolg
commented
2 years ago Score: 9/10
- FRQs 2-9 are deployed on Replit, at least 3 have input and output (I tested FRQs 2,3, and 5)
- All FRQs are organized and can be found in one place (Replit)
- Source for the FRQs is easily accessible
- FRQ takeaway page is linked
Comparisons
- For FRQ 2, your implementation is better because it uses the original College Board methods and modifies them so they work
- For FRQ 3, it would have been better if you showed the options that you had to select from instead of just the indices.
- For FRQ 8, I created a way for users to input in an array, which seems more applicable to the FRQ The only thing you're missing is FRQ 10 (-1)
Tangible Completion
Main Repl with all FRQs
Individual FRQ takeaway wiki FRQ's on IntelliJ
Comparison
FRQ 8 comparison: My FRQ8 is a little bit less complex than his because I wasn't able to get a working input. The UI was also a little bit better, mostly due to him having the code deployed and working on the front end. This didn't really matter because he just had a table that showed the numbers. Overall, our code worked the same and I think both of our FRQ'S were functional, but his was a little bit cleaner with the front end input and calculation.
Reflection
I think that overall, my FRQ skills are good. The one problem I have is that I do not know where to start when first seeing the FRQ problem. However, after this, once I get started on solving the problem and I have an idea, I am fast at what I do and I can start integrate different concepts I've learned to print a result. Using methods and lists, I can solve many problems since I am good with these topics, except for things such as arraylists and multiple classes and objects, I get confused since I am not good with calling multiple classes. But for simple code projects, I think I have good problem solving skills and I know how to use different methods and pieces of code to solve the FRQ's.
overall grade: 9.4/10