Open gaspardcereza opened 4 years ago
i would suggest to use lowercase, i.e. +imutils/+b1
, as also done for the +b0
package https://github.com/shimming-toolbox/shimming-toolbox/pull/125/files
i would suggest to use lowercase, i.e.
+imutils/+b1
, as also done for the+b0
package https://github.com/shimming-toolbox/shimming-toolbox/pull/125/files
I thought you once said that b0 could be misguiding because it could also refer to another term (I can't find the comment though so maybe I just dreamed about it).
i would suggest to use lowercase, i.e.
+imutils/+b1
, as also done for the+b0
package https://github.com/shimming-toolbox/shimming-toolbox/pull/125/filesI thought you once said that b0 could be misguiding because it could also refer to another term (I can't find the comment though so maybe I just dreamed about it).
indeed, in the MRI community "b0" often refers to the b-value =0 in DWI experiments. However, in this context, there should not be too much confusion (it is clear we talk about static B0 field), and i find the pros more appealing:
Context
We want the shimming toolbox to handle B0 and B1 shimming. So far, only B0 shimming was performed but I'm currently working on finding a way to include RF shimming features as we refactor our code.
Objectives
Add functions to perform B1 mapping and shimming to the
+imutils
package (under+imutils/+b1
). These functions will have to be documented following the convention that will be defined in #133. Unit tests and testing data must also be provided.