Closed noinkling closed 10 years ago
The old =' syntax works fine, but in the newer => syntax the > gets detected as Ruby. There's a bunch of possible combinations too:
='
=>
>
=< => =<> =>< =<' ='<
plus all the double-equals (==) variants of these.
==
The relevant regex is at line 559 here. I think something like this would work:
(==|=)(<>|><|<'|'<|<|>|')?|-
(except with the pointy brackets XML-escaped). I tried making it more elegant than that but it was difficult not making it match =<<, ='', etc.
=<<
=''
Edit: I opened a PR (#43).
The old
='syntax works fine, but in the newer=>syntax the>gets detected as Ruby. There's a bunch of possible combinations too:plus all the double-equals (
==) variants of these.The relevant regex is at line 559 here. I think something like this would work:
(except with the pointy brackets XML-escaped). I tried making it more elegant than that but it was difficult not making it match
=<<,='', etc.Edit: I opened a PR (#43).