In issue #201 - generated by a GH action (I believe) - the maintainers were told to promote revisions 34 and 35. These are not correct revisions. It should have suggested to promote 556 and 557.
As a result, if done without double-checking, the maintainers could (and did) easily promote an old, broken, insecure release. This shouldn't be allowed happen.
What should have happened?
The action should have informed the maintainer to promote the correct revisions.
What happened?
In issue #201 - generated by a GH action (I believe) - the maintainers were told to promote revisions 34 and 35. These are not correct revisions. It should have suggested to promote 556 and 557. As a result, if done without double-checking, the maintainers could (and did) easily promote an old, broken, insecure release. This shouldn't be allowed happen.
What should have happened?
The action should have informed the maintainer to promote the correct revisions.
Output of
snap info $snap_name
Output of
snap connections $snap_name
Output of
snap version
Relevant log output
No response
Teminal output of app
No response