ana-oprescu
commented
7 years ago | Exercise 1 | Comments | Exercise 2 | Comments | Exercise 3 | Comments | Exercise 4 | Comments | Exercise 5 | Comments | Exercise 6 | Comments | Exercise 7 | Comments | Exercise 8 | Comments | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Good Job. However, the code is kind of confusing, whey you did not use the MultM function provided? | 8 | Good analysis. However some statistical analysis would make it better | 9 | Why not starting in 4? Since you know that 2 and 3 are not composites | 7 | Very good, can be improved by continuing the test even after finding the first false positive, and printing all the found false positives | 6 | Analysis is ok. In your analysis/experiments you are not taking into account that a Carmichael number N fools the Fermat test if you check aˆ(N−1) for some a that is coprime with N. An analysis/test on that direction is needed | 6 | ->issues | 6 | ->issues | 10 | ->issues | 8.142857143 |