search

soxueren / whirlyglobe

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/whirlyglobe
0 stars 0 forks source link

Using Boost 1.50 #6

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Thanks for the great globe.
I would like to include latest version of Boost instead of 1.45.
According to notes, using header files of any latest Boost version works fine. 
But I would like to understand how Boost is getting compiled in whirlyglobe 
library and do we have to manually build whirlyglobe again to include latest 
version of Boost?

Thank you.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by anandPar...@gmail.com on 24 Aug 2012 at 5:39

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Which version of WhirlyGlobe are you using and is it the Component or the 
library itself?

Original comment by s...@mousebirdconsulting.com on 25 Aug 2012 at 11:46

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Version being used is Whirlyglobe 1.2 and library is being used.

Thank you.

Original comment by anandPar...@gmail.com on 28 Aug 2012 at 4:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Several of the boost header files are included.  To change the version you'd 
need to recompile, yes.

However, I suggest you upgrade to WhirlyGlobe 2.0 if you want to do that.  You 
might also look at the WhirlyGlobe Component, which is a much simpler 
pre-compiled version of WhirlyGlobe.

Those can both be found on github:
http://github.com/mousebird/WhirlyGlobe

Original comment by s...@mousebirdconsulting.com on 28 Aug 2012 at 2:42

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Thank you. I have checked whirlyglobe 2.0 and it also seems to be using older 
version of boost.

I will try to upgrade the boost version on 2.0 only.

Thanks.

Original comment by anandPar...@gmail.com on 10 Sep 2012 at 5:02

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I'd think it would be possible.  If you run into problems start up an issue on 
github and I'll look into it.

Original comment by s...@mousebirdconsulting.com on 10 Sep 2012 at 1:53