Closed braingram closed 1 year ago
Patch coverage is 100.00%
of modified lines.
Files Changed | Coverage |
---|---|
drizzle/doblot.py | 100.00% |
:loudspeaker: Thoughts on this report? Let us know!.
The docs for this PR built successfully on RTD and are hosted at https://spacetelescope-drizzle--112.org.readthedocs.build/en/112/; @mcara @nden could you check that these are complete when you have a minute?
I don't know why the sys.path
modification was there. It might be possible to import drizzle
prior to the path modification if the path modification is required for some other reason but I did not try this.
Should I open this PR or does it make more sense to include the change in one of the other PRs?
I don't know why the
sys.path
modification was there. It might be possible toimport drizzle
prior to the path modification if the path modification is required for some other reason but I did not try this.Should I open this PR or does it make more sense to include the change in one of the other PRs?
you could potentially change the base branch (the branch being merged into) to one on another PR
or alternatively make these changes on another PR (if you have review access I think you can push to that branch on another person's fork)
I don't know why the
sys.path
modification was there. It might be possible toimport drizzle
prior to the path modification if the path modification is required for some other reason but I did not try this. Should I open this PR or does it make more sense to include the change in one of the other PRs?you could potentially change the base branch (the branch being merged into) to one on another PR
or alternatively make these changes on another PR (if you have review access I think you can push to that branch on another person's fork)
Thanks!
I tried pushing to your fix_docs
branch and got a "Permission denied" error so what I propose is:
bjg-drizzle-rtd
branch to your fix_docs
branch: https://github.com/zacharyburnett/drizzle/pull/1fix_docs
PR https://github.com/spacetelescope/drizzle/pull/98 for reviewDoes that sound like a good plan?
@mcara if it's easier to merge this PR and close #98 and #111 I don't have any objections (I don't have permissions to merge this). I believe the commits captured the contributions from @zacharyburnett and @nden. Thanks all for work fixing this :)
Another attempt based off of: https://github.com/spacetelescope/drizzle/pull/111 @zacharyburnett @nden @mcara Would you check if this correctly built all the docs?
closes #98 and closes #111