Closed rderkachrf closed 1 year ago
Thank you for your submission! We have a total of 9 PRs open right now, and we are working hard on all of them! We will take a look as soon as we can.
@rderkachrf Static Tests results for commit 41772e1ffd0c3fff20f81a9e2f06db2e3c0e07f4 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nWJnLSYTsePJ7tg9DkZ0PddYq8BD6ZSq/view?usp=drivesdk
@rderkachrf Compile Tests results for commit 41772e1ffd0c3fff20f81a9e2f06db2e3c0e07f4 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iNaNKo_CXUqWf46yfPRXHvV327d0KhNC/view?usp=drivesdk
Hello @rderkachrf , As the app already exists on the Splunk Base with the a unique name, is there any reason for changing the name of app ?
Hi @hardik-crest Currently, there are three apps "Recorded Future App for Splunk", "Recorded Future Sandbox" and "Recorded Future". We want to rename this app to "Recorded Future App for Splunk SOAR" to follow the naming convention of our Splunk app. We also want to rename the sandbox app to "Recorded Future Sandbox for Splunk SOAR" in the future.
Thanks @rderkachrf , We will make the required changes accordingly.
cc : @nastorSplunk
@rderkachrf Static Tests results for commit 41772e1ffd0c3fff20f81a9e2f06db2e3c0e07f4 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XhfHN2OhvF0II0RIUKR1BFAZ8NXaGPNY/view?usp=drivesdk
@hardik-crest Static Tests results for commit cc8865e18dfc14c1ef26e0731d793bc31c537e21 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yswn8lUSrQ2QbON5xYhnkhzDzvbr-aas/view?usp=drivesdk
@hardik-crest Compile Tests results for commit cc8865e18dfc14c1ef26e0731d793bc31c537e21 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pmvks-vZibdwextNC5CPcQntNtmeIPU0/view?usp=drivesdk
@hardik-crest Static Tests results for commit 4c41dc840fd89033adb033636154e42f946d6cc1 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vmYO3tUSlLCSaz9Y4WAQlNgHjFyKX3mi/view?usp=drivesdk
@hardik-crest Compile Tests results for commit 4c41dc840fd89033adb033636154e42f946d6cc1 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qYoPJAfjHYrCZG-GMLvxCnXCvGN2f-kl/view?usp=drivesdk
@hardik-crest Static Tests results for commit a53c8b49122db5e694fe83abb71426ec880b269e - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1p7GaM_Vd--_6im3l-JM2ExBeJr7Z2xv-/view?usp=drivesdk
@hardik-crest Compile Tests results for commit a53c8b49122db5e694fe83abb71426ec880b269e - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g5iomBhQ4SFU67vfYYWjMnnfw_ffhzX_/view?usp=drivesdk
@hardik-crest Compile Tests results for commit a53c8b49122db5e694fe83abb71426ec880b269e - https://drive.google.com/file/d/13MXbAL0oN6naIagLtnm0VK8zentjFU-V/view?usp=drivesdk
@hardik-crest Static Tests results for commit 1374b670934b0892451d74be9dd17f74e373eced - https://drive.google.com/file/d/19rfjZqtoVv5Ksm5XJ2nk-vhWRlcGnUZ-/view?usp=drivesdk
@hardik-crest Compile Tests results for commit 1374b670934b0892451d74be9dd17f74e373eced - https://drive.google.com/file/d/186Z-bjFKk17ss1hScLjXCFFmc2X_fnKw/view?usp=drivesdk
@hardik-crest Static Tests results for commit 2b7176fa2305b9458271c15d5d6464e47d21b8f8 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CRfTxB-q6i01wTE_g2pUwlhMAyzQtVem/view?usp=drivesdk
Hello @rderkachrf , As this is a bug fix, according to standards changing the app version from 4.0.1 to 4.1.0
@hardik-crest Compile Tests results for commit 2b7176fa2305b9458271c15d5d6464e47d21b8f8 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LyH_5BPDmNRaFLYv7bFpwfv2Os61nJz7/view?usp=drivesdk
Hello @rderkachrf , As this is a bug fix, according to standards changing the app version from 4.0.1 to 4.1.0
Hello @hardik-crest. Got it. Thanks.
@hardik-crest Static Tests results for commit e830e8918db7a79d8ed7982d846c389966c28054 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VTvHell9PizaiDg58nJ1dcG7jgYbqoBL/view?usp=drivesdk
@hardik-crest Compile Tests results for commit e830e8918db7a79d8ed7982d846c389966c28054 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UQPf5EHSpBkHqd2LlmJG2dVyZ5n4fnx1/view?usp=drivesdk
Please ensure your pull request (PR) adheres to the following guidelines:
Pull Request Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
<App Name>: <PR Type> - <PR Description>
next
branch of the forked repo. Create separate feature branch for raising the PR.Pull Request Type
Please check the type of change your PR introduces:
Security Considerations (REQUIRED)
readme.html
.readme.html
all methods (eg, OAuth) used to authenticate with the service that the connector is integrating with.readme.html
.nosemgrep
? If yes, please provide justification in an additional comment next to the ignored code.Release Notes (REQUIRED)
What is the current behavior? (OPTIONAL)
What is the new behavior? (OPTIONAL)
Other information (OPTIONAL)
Pay close attention to (OPTIONAL)
Screenshots (if relevant)
Thanks for contributing!