Closed Mamun-Al-Babu-Shikder closed 1 week ago
Extending @ControllerAdvice
to be usable in Filter scope would mean giving up functionality that Spring already supports.
For example, war deployments.
Thanks for the proposal, but implementing the suggested change would break a lot of expectations and the hierarchy of web support. If you're looking for error handling at a filter level in Spring Boot applications, this already exists for WAR applications with the ErrorPageFilter
.
Issue Description: Currently, Spring Boot’s global exception handling mechanism, provided by @ControllerAdvice, handles exceptions at the controller level but does not capture exceptions thrown by filters. This limitation poses challenges for applications that need consistent error handling across all layers, including filters, for scenarios such as security checks, logging, and request pre-processing.
Problem Statement: When an exception is thrown in a filter, it typically does not reach the controller layer, which prevents @ControllerAdvice from handling it. Consequently, developers need to implement custom error handling in each filter, which is repetitive and can lead to inconsistencies in error responses across the application.
To handle filter exceptions globally, developers currently have to:
This limitation creates a fragmented approach to error handling and makes it challenging to maintain a unified error response structure in applications.
Proposed Solution: We propose adding a global exception handling mechanism for filters in Spring Boot, enabling consistent error handling across both filters and controllers. Here are some potential approaches for implementing this feature:
Exception Forwarding to /error Endpoint:
Enhanced ErrorAttributes for Filter Exceptions:
@ControllerAdvice Extension for Filters:
Benefits of the Proposed Solution:
Potential Use Cases: