Open wyc opened 3 years ago
I think that makes sense. I think it would be great to have that in a future release, and I'm wondering if we can even get it from the transaction metadata due to a Tezos transaction revealing the pubkey. This could eliminate a field in the smart contract, which is a good thing. It may have impact on the testability, however.
If we do keep the public_key
field in the rotation_event
, perhaps we should name it something also such as active_public_key
to add clarity as to which public key we mean.
Should we add a TZIP-016 getter for the active key so users don't need to pass the public key to the resolver?