I'm not sure if this captures the previous points about the dependence on servers in the federated model of email, and the burden of having to run servers. But I don't necessarily have anything better to suggest. The arguments added are about security and privacy, while the article is about "avoiding centralization and singletons." The newer text points out the actual centralization that happened with email, while the older text was about the conceptual centralization of it; maybe the concreteness is more useful. Anyone else have thoughts on this?
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
I'm not sure if this captures the previous points about the dependence on servers in the federated model of email, and the burden of having to run servers. But I don't necessarily have anything better to suggest. The arguments added are about security and privacy, while the article is about "avoiding centralization and singletons." The newer text points out the actual centralization that happened with email, while the older text was about the conceptual centralization of it; maybe the concreteness is more useful. Anyone else have thoughts on this?