Closed stakx closed 6 years ago
The transform for nullable types to question mark syntax makes sense for closed generic types such as Nullable<int>, but not so much for the generic type definition Nullable<> itself.
Nullable<int>
Nullable<>
Fixed in eb875cad61ee1500737522178407b3183fa85c99. For the generic type definition of Nullable<>, the transform is not applied.
The transform for nullable types to question mark syntax makes sense for closed generic types such as
Nullable<int>
, but not so much for the generic type definitionNullable<>
itself.