Open mattpocock opened 2 years ago
Is this desired though? It somewhat looks incomplete and/or implies that some child states can be added to it.
Yes, because you want to be able to make parallel-based checks, like so:
https://discord.com/channels/795785288994652170/962341003266760786/962343455135264828
Yuck 😬 I don't have a better idea though - so ye, we should support this then
Agree; this should be supported
I.e. in this machine:
You should be able to run:
state.matches({ a: {} })