Closed aschliewert closed 4 years ago
Sounds reasonable. If I set up a new example, could you check it with all validators (for 1.x, 2.1 and XRechnung)?
I am using online validators for XRechnung CII format for version 2.1. But I can try.
One of the validators I am using is https://www.epoconsulting.com/erechnung/xrechnung-validator (KoSIT Validator).
Yes, that's the most famous one. Did you see this though: https://github.com/stephanstapel/ZUGFeRD-csharp/issues/75 ?
@aschliewert i wouldn't recommend this one. You can set up the official kosit validator yourself. Just search for the github repo and follow the steps. There is a XRechnung configuration in the readme, follow the instructions of the configuration and you should be up and running and you should be able to verify your documents.
I have updated the example in the test application (https://github.com/stephanstapel/ZUGFeRD-csharp/blob/master/ZUGFeRD-Test/Application.cs). It now matches 99.9% with https://github.com/stephanstapel/ZUGFeRD-csharp/blob/master/documentation/zuferd211/Beispiele/XRECHNUNG/zugferd_2p1_XRECHNUNG_Einfach.pdf.
I guess this is finished? Can we close this issue?
Hi. Thank you for all the answeres and your quick help. Yes this issue can be closed.
Hi. Is it possible to get an working code example which creates a valid XRechnung in the CII format? Maybe the code example in the ReadMe File could be updated? Whatever I do, the validator throws many errors.
Thanks in advance.