Open JGilbert-eLife opened 5 years ago
@JGilbert-eLife
The following elements should also be included in sec.
@FAtherden-eLife - please could you take a look at the elements Fabio mentioned? Was there any reason we excluded any of these from the XML requirements in this ticket? I think verse/verse-group may simply have been missed, but I'm not sure about the rest? I just want to make sure we don't need to make similar changes in other tickets.
Thanks!
Thanks @JGilbert-eLife! verse-group
I simply missed.
@fabiobatalha in #1318 we specified that disp-formula
(and disp-formula-group
elsewhere) should always be treated as inline content and captured in a p
element (or similar, like td
, title
etc.). As a result I didn't include them as allowed children of sec
- does that requirement still work for you?
With regard to graphic
, tex-math
, mml:math
- can you tell me what context these would be used in. Would these always be captured in the following elements:
or do you need these to be able to be placed outside of these elements?
Description
Sections are used to organise the content of an article.
User stories
Author
But what if . . . ?
Consideration
XML requirements
Level of section headings determined by the nesting of
sec
.Captured as a simple
title
. For eLife, everysec
must have atitle
- this seems like a sensible rule to mandate (from a content architecture perspective).Children of
sec/title
:The following elements should be allowed as children of
sec
elements in the body of the text/appendices:Mock ups
Proposal