Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
You are using a standard network adapter (Not a USB or firewire one or
something)?
CPU usage is working, right?
Original comment by mattme...@gmail.com
on 2 Feb 2010 at 2:51
Yes, I'm using the integrated wireless card, and yes cpu and all other stats
are working
Original comment by DeadRip...@gmail.com
on 2 Feb 2010 at 7:12
I'll test it on my laptop when I get a chance, but think it works fine with my
laptop's wireless... If so, unlikely I'll be able to figure it out,
unfortunately.
Original comment by mattme...@gmail.com
on 2 Feb 2010 at 7:15
I had to go into the countermanager.c and specify the net card, all good now
Original comment by DeadRip...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2010 at 6:43
That's odd...Sometimes you get duplicate devices, and I remove those, but
otherwise,
the function to get the combined bandwidth of all devices should give exactly
the
same thing as the sum of all devices that you could get doing things that way.
Might
be a bug in my duplicate device detection code...
Original comment by mattme...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2010 at 6:47
Well i have a related question for you, instead of haveing to edit the script
everytime i switch from my wireless to hardline, is there anyway to add the 2?
This
is what i have for currently
function NetworkUpdate() {
%down = GetAllDown()["Atheros AR928X Wireless Network Adapter"];
%downGraph.Update(%down);
%up = GetAllUp()["Atheros AR928X Wireless Network Adapter"];
%upGraph.Update(%up);
}
Original comment by DeadRip...@gmail.com
on 8 Feb 2010 at 3:21
%down = GetAllDown()["Atheros AR928X Wireless Network Adapter"] +
GetAllDown()["Other Network Adapter Name"];
And same for up.
Original comment by mattme...@gmail.com
on 8 Feb 2010 at 3:24
works like a charm! thank you so much, this is by far my favorite script for my
g13
Original comment by DeadRip...@gmail.com
on 8 Feb 2010 at 9:41
Issue 9 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by mattme...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 5:11
I currently have the name of my Ethernet network adapter like
function NetworkUpdate() {
%down = GetAllDown()["Atheros AR928X Wireless Network Adapter"];
%downGraph.Update(%down);
%up = GetAllUp()["Atheros AR928X Wireless Network Adapter"];
%upGraph.Update(%up);
}
BUT, i still get incorrect values example, truly downloading at 1.4MB/s but it
shows 6.30 MB/s.
Original comment by akbal...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 5:15
It seems to be around ~5x the correct value.
Original comment by akbal...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 5:22
Now that is really weird. I believe I've had a similar report in the past, but
I just pass on exactly what Microsoft gives to me, so don't think I can
implement any general purpose fix, unfortunately.
However, if they always have the same ratio, you could just divide the values
by 4 (or 5) or something, like:
%down = GetAllDown()["Atheros AR928X Wireless Network Adapter"]/4;
(I suspect it's off by a factor of 4, just because 2 levels of redundant
reporting give you a ratio of 4 to 1, but the value you report look more like 5
to 1).
Original comment by mattme...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 5:23
What is odd is that i have another plugin g15netspeed which shows the correct
speeds, i will use the divide by factor method, i just dont seee what causes
that.
Original comment by akbal...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 5:26
For checking accuracy, you should look at task manager->networking, rather than
what an application claims. Applications don't report overhead bandwidth, but
I believe the value I report includes overhead.
Original comment by mattme...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 5:27
no that is what i mean, my max speed 1.4MB/s +- 100KB/s is correct else where,
something strange is happening inside this plugin with my computer devices.
Original comment by akbal...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 5:31
There are a number of different ways of getting bandwidth. I use a method that
reports per-device bandwidth, and then add everything up. No idea what method
g15netspeed uses, and it's not open source. As I don't have the issue on any
of my systems, and Microsoft's specs don't mention anything about it, can't
really look into it.
Original comment by mattme...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 5:31
thanks anyways, i will see what i can do
Original comment by akbal...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 5:35
While i got your attention, is there a way to replace the fraps FPS with EVGA
Precision FPS?
Original comment by akbal...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 5:56
If EVGA uses shared memory, sure. If not, not without a ton of effort on your
part.
Original comment by mattme...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 5:16
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
DeadRip...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2010 at 11:07