Paper Title

[prisae]

The current working title is

Status of the open-source landscape for 3D CSEM modeling

but we can probably come up with something better. Please put your ideas here.

[Moouuzi]

State-of-the-art open-source software for 3D CSEM modeling Open-source developments for modeling complex 3D controlled-source electromagentic setups.

[ocastilloreyes]

I like the second option that Rafael mentioned.

This is my proposal: 3D CSEM modeling - A review and comparison of open-source codes for modeling complex setups

[lheagy]

I quite like the use of landscape in @prisae's working title - it suggests a high-level overview of what exists and where things are going. I hesitate a bit with state-of-the-art and / or comparison language as it then starts to suggest a bit more of a competitive comparison, which I am not sure that we want to promote.

My vote would be for @prisae's original suggestion, or something like

• 3D CSEM modeling: an overview of the open-source landscape
• An overview of the open-source landscape for 3D CSEM modeling

[Moouuzi]

As Lindays says "landscape" is a good word to describe our paper, I'd suggest to keep this idea! I'm not a fan of "topic: specification", so I tend to the second title.

[prisae]

I put now Lindsey's second option - we can still change it once we finished a draft paper.

Also, we might get a mix of BE and AE (modeling/modelling etc). However, I think we should simply ignore that for the time being, and everyone writes the way it suits her/him best. Once we know to what journal we submit we can quickly go through and change it. This is something that does not take a lot of time to change at the end.