search

synapsecns / sanguine

Synapse Monorepo
MIT License
43 stars 31 forks source link

RFQ Indexer: adding search by origin tx #3277

Closed Defi-Moses closed 1 month ago

Defi-Moses commented 1 month ago

Adding search by origin txn hash and not just transactionID.

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the getTransactionById function in the transactionIdController.ts file, allowing it to retrieve deposit records based on either transactionId or transactionHash. Additionally, the OpenAPI documentation for the /transaction-id/{transactionId} endpoint has been updated to reflect this new dual functionality. The overall structure of the function and the documentation remains intact, with no alterations to exported or public entities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/rfq-indexer/api/src/controllers/... Modified getTransactionById to allow retrieval by either transactionId or transactionHash.
packages/rfq-indexer/api/src/routes/... Updated OpenAPI documentation for /transaction-id/{transactionId} to clarify dual functionality.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

size/m, Sol, Typescript

Suggested reviewers

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
A change was made, we can't stop!
Transaction flows now dance and twirl,
With hashes and IDs in a whirl.
Hooray for queries, broad and bright,
In our code, all feels just right! 🐇✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
🪧 Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
cloudflare-workers-and-pages[bot] commented 1 month ago

Deploying sanguine-fe with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 89f6ac4
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://567918d9.sanguine-fe.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://feat-search-by-txhash.sanguine-fe.pages.dev

View logs

codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 31.73701%. Comparing base (099624f) to head (89f6ac4). Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #3277 +/- ## =================================================== + Coverage 30.65718% 31.73701% +1.07983% =================================================== Files 447 427 -20 Lines 29794 28503 -1291 Branches 82 82 =================================================== - Hits 9134 9046 -88 + Misses 19809 18609 -1200 + Partials 851 848 -3 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/synapsecns/sanguine/pull/3277/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=synapsecns) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [packages](https://app.codecov.io/gh/synapsecns/sanguine/pull/3277/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=synapsecns) | `90.44834% <ø> (ø)` | | | [promexporter](https://app.codecov.io/gh/synapsecns/sanguine/pull/3277/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=synapsecns) | `?` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=synapsecns#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.