synapsecns / sanguine

Synapse Monorepo
MIT License
43 stars 31 forks source link

[Snyk] Security upgrade ethers from 5.7.2 to 6.0.0 #3298

Closed trajan0x closed 3 weeks ago

trajan0x commented 1 month ago

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the yarn dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory. If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

⚠️ Warning ``` Failed to update the yarn.lock, please update manually before merging. ```

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue
high severity Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
SNYK-JS-ELLIPTIC-8187303

[!IMPORTANT]

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information: 🧐 View latest project report 📜 Customise PR templates 🛠 Adjust project settings 📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

cloudflare-workers-and-pages[bot] commented 1 month ago

Deploying sanguine-fe with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: dfd1633
Status:🚫  Build failed.

View logs

codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Bundle Report

Changes will decrease total bundle size by 3.91MB (-10.96%) :arrow_down:. This is within the configured threshold :white_check_mark:

Detailed changes | Bundle name | Size | Change | | ----------- | ---- | ------ | | sdk-router-@synapsecns/sdk-router-esm | 255.26kB | 609 bytes (0.24%) :arrow_up: | | sdk-router-@synapsecns/sdk-router-cjs | 117.55kB | 312 bytes (0.27%) :arrow_up: | | explorer-ui-server-cjs* | 708.77kB | 157.29kB (-18.16%) :arrow_down: | | explorer-ui-client-array-push* | 2.15MB | 162.77kB (-7.04%) :arrow_down: | | synapse-interface-client-array-push* | 7.38MB | 100.46kB (1.38%) :arrow_up: | | synapse-interface-server-cjs* | 1.65MB | 151.29kB (10.12%) :arrow_up: | | widget-cjs-esm* | 271.27kB | 2.03kB (-0.74%) :arrow_down: | | docs-bridge-client-array-push* | 7.28MB | 619.12kB (-7.83%) :arrow_down: | | docs-bridge-server-cjs* | 11.31MB | 3.57MB (-23.98%) :arrow_down: | | synapse-constants-esm-cjs* | 174.63kB | 174.63kB (100%) :arrow_up: | | synapse-constants-cjs-esm* | 174.18kB | 174.18kB (100%) :arrow_up: |

ℹ️ *Bundle size includes cached data from a previous commit

codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 90.44834%. Comparing base (99cf53e) to head (dfd1633). Report is 83 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #3298 +/- ## ==================================================== + Coverage 35.14833% 90.44834% +55.30001% ==================================================== Files 77 54 -23 Lines 2663 1026 -1637 Branches 82 82 ==================================================== - Hits 936 928 -8 + Misses 1722 95 -1627 + Partials 5 3 -2 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/synapsecns/sanguine/pull/3298/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=synapsecns) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [opbot](https://app.codecov.io/gh/synapsecns/sanguine/pull/3298/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=synapsecns) | `?` | | | [packages](https://app.codecov.io/gh/synapsecns/sanguine/pull/3298/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=synapsecns) | `90.44834% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=synapsecns#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

This PR is stale because it has been open 14 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

:no_entry: Ignored keywords (2) * WIP * DO NOT MERGE

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
🪧 Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.