Closed olliw42 closed 1 day ago
Hi @olliw42, we are requesting all the project reserved addresses to also provide documentation for their uses for this spec, and are reaching out to existing reservations to contribute.
@tbs-fpv many thanks for the response
does this imply that you are generally ok with adding them? I mean, I really would hate it when I would do the work for documenting and then would just get a 'no'.
@tbs-fpv many thanks for the response
does this imply that you are generally ok with adding them? I mean, I really would hate it when I would do the work for documenting and then would just get a 'no'.
we assume that you have control over both sides (signal generation and receiving) and the use case can't be satisfied with existing frames/ranges. in that case, yes.
@tbs-fpv
we assume that you have control over both sides (signal generation and receiving
yes, we have all ends under our control
the use case can't be satisfied with existing frames/ranges
yes, the use case can't be realized with existing frames
looks good to me. we'll get it pushed through this week. thanks for your contribution!
THX !!
Thank you for the extra information. Looks really good!
MANY THX !!
@tbs-trappy @kamik2
On behalf of the mLRS project I want to very kindly ask to reserve the types 0x81, 0x82 for said project.
The usage is similar to the 0x80 type reserved for ArduPilot or 0x78,0x79 types reserved for KISS Fc, to use it for home-brewed stuff, which in case of mLRS is crucial for supporting Lua scripts on the radio.