Closed Chris-Schnaufer closed 4 years ago
kwargs['containing'].split(",")
coordinates are epsg:4326 [no explicit coordinate system specified]Look at documentation and tickets regarding this
I am curious- are projections using epsg:4326 and epsg:32612 (UTM 12N) identical? Locally, I always use UTM 12N.
@rickw-ward Sorry for the delay in my response. I am not an expert in coordinate systems so I can't answer knowledgeably on this, but I do know there must be a difference in representation since they have different epsg numbers. Also, all conversion introduce errors - how serious the errors are is dependent upon the type of coordinate systems involved (rectilinear, spherical, other) and the desired level of accuracy. Thus, it's better to always convert from the original coordinate system to the targeted system, without any intermediate conversions.
The analysis is completed. Next step is to review with TERRA REF developers
David and Chris to review Thursday meeting w/ IL Urbana
@robkooper fyi
Next steps: I'll take a close look at this list but overall I think these are good changes and we can start implementing on a branch whenever ready. David also recommends adding tests where possible.
The problem with TERRA REF's expectation is that source images, shapes, and other data may not be in the expected coordinate system (EPSG 4326). This may be due to error introduced by reprojecting data.