Closed db39 closed 1 year ago
@mtlynch - I've tested this EDID and found no issues so far.
I added --check
to the decode test and it seems to work as expected.
Is there anything else that to do before a review?
You mentioned having to work around AW EDID Editor bugs. Can we document those in the comment above the EDID?
⏳ @mtlynch please review this Pull Request
Our previous EDIDs failed to conform with
edid-decode
's--check
flag. This updated EDID has a number of modifications to make it conform with the tests - fixing the warnings and failed attributes.Warnings fixed:
IT Video formats are now underscanned by default.
There are no longer multiple native progressive timings defined.
Failures fixed:
Detailed Timing Descriptor 1 no longer lists an image size. Detailed Timing Descriptor 2 no longer lists an image size.
Display Range Limits now sets the correct bytes: Byte 11 is 0x00 and Bytes 12-17 are now 0x20.
There are no longer more Native Detailed Timing Descriptors than Detailed Timing Descriptors.
Removed duplicate video data definition (VIC 60)
Adjusted monitor ranges to 24-90 Hz (Vertical Freq) and 18-80 kHz (Horizontal Freq)