search

todogroup / ospology

📖 OSPOlogy - The Study of OSPOs
https://todogroup.org
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
191 stars 91 forks source link

[OSPO Book] Scenarios & Recommendations - CH 4 #455

Closed anajsana closed 4 months ago

anajsana commented 8 months ago

Based on discussions from the past contributors' call: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lbq_EfpAS3B7ygh8LkqLXiheAFwKWx3gYORAB7Aggio/edit

Two main scenarios were discussed:

Several best practices were raised during the call (see meeting notes for reference)

netlify[bot] commented 8 months ago

Deploy Preview for ospomindmap canceled.

Name Link
Latest commit cd147633f5d96d63e1ef9157b30a07b98e6e8169
Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/ospomindmap/deploys/660c25c7b4d5b600081f5d84
netlify[bot] commented 8 months ago

Deploy Preview for ospobook ready!

Name Link
Latest commit cd147633f5d96d63e1ef9157b30a07b98e6e8169
Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/ospobook/deploys/660c25c760a50f00083176bb
Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-455--ospobook.netlify.app
Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

alice-sowerby commented 7 months ago

@anajsana I think that this PR and the google doc have become out of sync. At least, I believe there is more input on the google doc since this PR has been created!

This PR could be merged and the next round of changes added later, or we could abandon this PR and go back to editing - what do you prefer?

anajsana commented 6 months ago

@anajsana I think that this PR and the google doc have become out of sync. At least, I believe there is more input on the google doc since this PR has been created!

This PR could be merged and the next round of changes added later, or we could abandon this PR and go back to editing - what do you prefer?

Good point, @alice-sowerby. It seems that this PR was created in the past and is now far behind the live version / main branch (see here). I noticed that the Google Doc is more aligned with the structure / content of the main branch of chapter-4.md, not the branch in this PR. +1 to close this PR without merging and open a new PR based on the g Doc.

PS: before doing this, we should make sure that the use case on the "Social Engineering Attack on Upstream xz/liblzma" that @UlisesGascon reviewed is also included in the new PR (so we don't lose this contribution)

anajsana commented 4 months ago

Included the changes from this PR in a new PR that contains the review of chapter 4 here: https://github.com/todogroup/ospology/pull/500 - also including @UlisesGascon change