It should not try to call vectors with 0 arguments

[gacelita]

In core.cljc: (if (ifn? t) (t) t)))

I think it should be: (if (fn? t) (t) t)))

This way, vectors stop being called with 0 arguments.

[tonsky]

Why exactly is it happening? Are you putting vector in dictionary? Why? It’s actually perfectly valid to return substitute of functions (e.g. maps) as well as real functions from dictionary.

[gacelita]

I am building a personal website. The website has a list of works. The works have a description that has to be translated in English and Spanish. So I put the works (which are stored in a vector) in the dictionary. Is this a bad idea? Should it be a list instead?

I know that I can store functions in the dictionary, but I do not want to store a function whose only purpose is to return the vector. I chose to fork tongue and make the change I mentioned here.

[tonsky]

Interesting, I haven't envisioned tongue to be a storage for any random stuff, only strings. But your use-case makes sense, I'm thinking now how to better address it without sacrificing agility that ifn provides. Any ideas (besides chaning to fn?)

[gacelita]

Revisiting this, it's not that difficult to simply dispatch the proper collection without putting the collections inside tongue's dictionaries. Putting a large, dynamic amount of data inside the dictionaries does not seem like a good practice.

You can close this, if you want. Greets!