Closed Drodt closed 1 month ago
Should this maybe rather replace the annotation
in the block above? The annotation is later used for the annote
field after all so it doesn't really make sense to have it twice.
Should this maybe rather replace the
annotation
in the block above? The annotation is later used for theannote
field after all so it doesn't really make sense to have it twice.
Looks like you're right. But I would like confirmation by the main developers. I don't want to break things.
I'll check tomorrow. I have a hunch that our documentation of annote and note switches their meaning up vis-à-vis biblatex and possibly CSL.
By the way @Drodt, do you think you can update #105? I like the change and we will release a new Hayagriva version tomorrow.
By the way @Drodt, do you think you can update #105? I like the change and we will release a new Hayagriva version tomorrow.
It can be merged without errors now.
Closed in favor of #220
The
note
field of biblatex was not added to the note field of hayagriva during conversion. This PR fixes this.