Closed maccac closed 5 years ago
Changing our existing on prem behaviour will be difficult. As such we could allow the filename to be configurable as follows:
@PropertySource(value = ["\${extra.properties.files}"], ignoreResourceNotFound = true)
This means we can add an additional property if we wish without forcing the naming convention of a private.properties file on others. If no additional property file is specified it will just be ignored.
I would probably recommend that users stick with standard spring application-
Your thoughts @rajeshgpai?
We currently reference a
private.properties
file. This is something that we had to do for our application due our on-prem setup. If we can't change our on-prem setup and remove this property file we can look at making its path a configuration option.