Closed valencebond closed 4 years ago
In original EQL, the loss weight is 0 only for negative samples of foreground rare category . But according to Sec4.2, the weight term for negative samples of foreground rare category will be 1, That means all samples weight is 1?
Yes, your understanding is right. BTW, this implementation doesn't apply this rule since we found that it doesn't lead to a better result.
Thanks for your good paper and code. As in Implementation Details Section 4.2,
In original EQL, the loss weight is 0 only for negative samples of foreground rare category . But according to Sec4.2, the weight term for negative samples of foreground rare category will be 1, That means all samples weight is 1?
i am not familiar with LVIS datasets and the settings of additional image-level annotations, so please correct me if there is something wrong.