Closed seanluyk closed 8 years ago
I think this is because the current functionality does a (keyword) search for the subject terms. We can probably make this a subject search (advanced), but I don't think we'll be able to make it a facet operation, given that we are now combining LCSH terms, while the facets keep them separate. I'll have to dig more deeply into it.
I think the ideal action would be a subject phrase search.
@redlibrarian @theLinkResolver - I wonder if this is something worth discussing at our next group meeting? I see how a keyword search for subject terms has its advantages as well. For my music examples, the exact subject heading is the ideal action, but I wonder if this is widely applicable?
@seanluyk @theLinkResolver I'm happy to bring this to the wider group for a decision.
Maybe at our next meeting, @redlibrarian? I'm of two minds on this issue: I like that the top results are likely items that contain the exact subject heading, and for many disciplines, a keyword approach for subjects returns additional relevant items; for disciplines where subject headings are applied to indicate what the item IS (e.g. a clarinet concerto), it becomes less helpful.
Closing for now. We can reopen if a problem presents itself.
Where I previously stated that a subject phrase search would be ideal, I was quite impressed with the results of a subject keyword search as we saw at today's meeting. Relevance keeps the results we want at the top, while the keyword aspect broadens the search to bring other related materials into view.
Just stumbled across this one, and I'm not sure if I'm not understanding how this is supposed to work:
I don't recall experiencing this behaviour before.