Open megaserg opened 4 years ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 0%
with 12 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 86.13%. Comparing base (
589d40c
) to head (b87919b
). Report is 124 commits behind head on master.
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
petastorm/gcsfs_helpers/gcsfs_wrapper.py | 0.00% | 12 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
@selitvin @aleks-djuric Not sure what does the complaint from codecov/patch
mean. Would you like to review?
@aleks-djuric ,If you are familiar with gcs nuances, perhaps you could help review this PR?
I fixed this by just doing obj_path.strip('/')
. Not familiar with how this process works. Should I create a new pull request?
Either @megaserg incorporates the fix you propose (I think it's preferable since we'll keep only one PR for the issue), or create a separate PR and we can review and land that.
@megaserg : we don't have tests for GCSFS and not sure if we can set them up easily. We will be able to land the PR regardless.
@megaserg, as a last ask, since we don't have a proper unittest setup, can you please paste an example of how the walk function output looks like to the comment of this PR for a sanity check?
Resolves #558