Closed eggrobin closed 2 months ago
I don't understand why you need this. Proto-cuneiform isn't planned for 17.0, is it?
I don't understand why you need this.
Because I am drafting properties for the Archaic Cuneiform Numerals proposal, which introduces sc=Pcun and scx=Xsux Pcun characters, and I do not want to deal with divergent versions of these Java files (it is only in the actual data files that I can do automated conflict resolution).
Adding these to the enumeration several versions ahead has been standard procedure, see https://github.com/unicode-org/unicodetools/pull/888, https://github.com/unicode-org/unicodetools/pull/660, https://github.com/unicode-org/unicodetools/pull/546, and https://github.com/unicode-org/unicodetools/pull/443. See the last one of those for more explanations.
I see. I thought these were sc=Xsux.
I thought these were sc=Xsux.
The proposal has all three of scx=Xsux, scx=Xsux Pcun, and scx=Pcun (where Xsux « wins » for the Script property). See §§1, 2.3.3, and 2.3.4.
Same procedure as https://github.com/unicode-org/unicodetools/pull/888, as this one already has a script code.