Closed gonzalo-bulnes closed 1 year ago
Looks like GPLv3 in most, if not all, of their spec files.
You are right @Asmith9555, I overlooked the spec files! Remain to know which copyright statements to use to comply with the terms of the GPL3-or-later. 🙂
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 03:47:26PM -0700, Austin Smith wrote:
Looks like GPLv3 in most, if not all, of their spec files.
-- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/unman/shaker/issues/24#issuecomment-1599677015 You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Message ID: @.***>
I really should change the spec files. Do what the fuck you want to. https://github.com/unman/unman/blob/master/License
Hi @unman!
Thanks for sharing these states! I am keen on using some of them (starting by the
cacher
state) that I'd like to adapt to my own needs. I usually package my own states and make them public mostly for convenience (example), I'd be keen on doing the same with any work derived from yours.I haven't found any copyright statement or license information in the repo, though:
If that helps, I'm happy to open a PR with that information if you tell me your preferences. 🙂
@tlaurion as the only other contributor listed, I assume you'd be fine with @unman's choice of license, but I'd ask you what's the copyright statement you prefer for your own contributions 🙂