Hi authors!
I've been trying to reproduce the SalsaNext results you have on your paper using the provided pretrained model (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DxuzlnFKnU8EpSuODRywJUrJlieUUheg/view?usp=sharing).
My confusion comes from the fact that I am getting identical IOUs for the latter 11 classes, but much lower IOUs for the first 3 classes (grass, tree, bush), reducing the total mIOU from 43.07 to 37.8.
I see that the table you have on your README also suffers from this: all other IOUs are identical to the ones on the paper except the first 3 classes, reducing the mIOU from 43.07 to 40.20.
Do you guys know why this might be?
Was the dataset/labels updated after you got your results?
Thanks for the help!
Hi authors! I've been trying to reproduce the SalsaNext results you have on your paper using the provided pretrained model (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DxuzlnFKnU8EpSuODRywJUrJlieUUheg/view?usp=sharing).
My confusion comes from the fact that I am getting identical IOUs for the latter 11 classes, but much lower IOUs for the first 3 classes (grass, tree, bush), reducing the total mIOU from 43.07 to 37.8.
I see that the table you have on your README also suffers from this: all other IOUs are identical to the ones on the paper except the first 3 classes, reducing the mIOU from 43.07 to 40.20.
Do you guys know why this might be?
Was the dataset/labels updated after you got your results?
Thanks for the help!