Open ledm opened 1 year ago
@ledm thanks to you we now have a "standards" label, although am a bit scared to look at this PR just yet :rofl:
@ledm this is starting to become stale, mate. You reckon we can just power on sometime and get it over the finish line? I can help with it since I have to yapf a whole lot of code for the ANCIL project too
I think the tests are currently failing because they reference some of the objects that were renamed in this PR. I'll see what I can do.
Edit. nope, jsut me being stupid.
nice! Then you reckon is close to merge? I can plop a flake8
test then - that'll say "look how standardy and PEPy this package is"
Ran a linter, and a few refactors over bgcval2.
Code should be cleaner and more readable, but a lot of changes to review.
Happy to do it in stages.
Closes #106