FIR OBBB-E defines "oceanic" field as 9 (typo?)

[dneuge]

OBBB-E currently holds a value of 9 in the oceanic field: (comments added by me)

{
  "type": "Feature",
  "properties": {
    "id": "OBBB-E",
    "oceanic": "9", // should probably be only 0 or 1?
    "label_lon": "52.491067",
    "label_lat": "26.202716",
    "region": "EMEA",
    "division": "VATMENA"
  },
  "geometry": {
    "type": "MultiPolygon",
    "coordinates": [
      [
        // omitted from this excerpt
      ]
    ]
  }
}

While I don't know what the exact format should look like I suspect this is a typo and maybe was probably supposed to be 0 unless there has been some recent change. I've never encountered values other than 0 and 1 on that field before and OBBB-E is also the only FIR using that value in the current revision.

[amosngSP]

Looks like an error. I'll do a PR to amend it. @DedpewlControl fyi

[DedpewlControl]

Hello! This is indeed an error on my end. This sector is not an oceanic sector.

[dneuge]

Thanks a lot! :)