vcvpaiva / SICK-processing

0 stars 0 forks source link

Implications in PWN #4

Open vcvpaiva opened 6 years ago

vcvpaiva commented 6 years ago

from https://github.com/own-pt/rte-sick/issues/73

typing ==> writing (PWN gloss says: write by means of a keyboard with types) 01004692-v ==> 00993014-v

sawing ==> cutting (PWN gloss says: cut with a saw) 01559590-v ==> 01552519-v

running ==> moving (PWN gloss says: move fast by using one's feet, with one foot off the ground at any given time) 02099829-v ==> 01835496-v 41 synsets for run, cycle run->run?

hiking ==> walking ==> moving (walk a long way, as for pleasure or physical exercise) 01920932-v ==> 01904930-v

swimming ==> moving (move as if gliding through water)

dancing ==> moving (3 senses) grazing ==> eating (PWN gloss says: feed as in a meadow or pasture) battling ==> fighting lazying ==> idling ==> resting

someone ==> person (PWN gloss says: a human being) man ==> person (PWN gloss says: an adult person who is male) woman ==> person (PWN gloss says: an adult female person) baby ==> person biker ==> person (not in PWN) clown ==> person (PWN: a person who amuses others by ridiculous behavior) fish ==> animal


stats for3+4+5 tokens:

in 390 sentences (275 lemmas) we have only 1 conjunction, 19 negs marked, 37 negations not marked (27expletive+no, 10 nobody)= 56 negations in total. 140 direct object ones and 5 passive ones, hence, 233 -140= 88 intransitives, of which 13 copulas. this is all half wrong, of course. 385 nsubjs.

Crossing out the implications present in PWN. if they're not found, either SD or Jigsaw issue.