Open sicheste opened 5 months ago
I just recognized that the current docker image is already 4 years old. I will try in the next days to build my own one using the current master branch and give it a try. Maybe it is time for a new version :)
So, I had some time. I have created a new docker image locally, based on the current master branch. Running mbmd scan
was not detecting the SDM120M. But manually giving it as SDM220:3 (it is number 3 on the bus) it works. Data in MQTT and on the web interface are fine.
So, still open:
https://hub.docker.com/r/isarrider/mbmd/tags try mine...
@isarrider am I missing an open PR that did not get merged?
nah, I just wanted to give @sicheste and others a docker image that isnt old... (actually thats why I started also building mine, bc there is no newer)
Thank you. Would be happy for build workflow PR- don't have the time...
I know the feeling but I am always hoping for the young IT Students or similar...
If I add the SDM120M as
SDM220
to the config, I will not get all values. Especially thePower (W)
is missing. If I add it as aSDM
I get this value.As![image](https://github.com/volkszaehler/mbmd/assets/7395079/3391c8fa-1e41-4eab-9201-a64df21ed4ff)
SDM220
:As![image](https://github.com/volkszaehler/mbmd/assets/7395079/b593eaab-736c-420e-896f-e345b69b7e79)
SDM
:Btw: What is the
name
field in the config for? The name (hereSDM2201.3
andSDM1.3
is constructed by type + position in the alphabetically sorted list of sensors +.
or-
+ bus id. Thus the names in the API and MQTT are unstable.Btw2:
docker run volkszaehler/mbmd scan -a 192.168.2.11:502
did not detect the SDM120.