The above statement enforces the need for a mandatory sh:path in a PropertyShape. However one can also use other path statements https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#property-paths.
Can the informal statement below be improved as follows:
Informally, property shapes specify constraints that need to be met with respect to nodes that can be reached from the focus node either by directly following a given property (specified as an IRI) or any other SHACL property path, specified using sh:path.
The shacl property path is expressed using the operations defined in 2.3.1.
In https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#property-shapes
The above statement enforces the need for a mandatory sh:path in a PropertyShape. However one can also use other path statements https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#property-paths.
Can the informal statement below be improved as follows: