willettk / gzhubble

Reduction and analysis materials for the Galaxy Zoo: Hubble project.
http://hubble.galaxyzoo.org
MIT License
4 stars 5 forks source link

Paper Acceptance Minor Comment 5 #206

Closed Mel23 closed 8 years ago

Mel23 commented 8 years ago

5) "Only nine galaxies that were strongly boosted (f_features < 0.25 and f_features,best > 0.50)."

Unless I'm misinterpreting things, there are still some places where the subscripting needs to be cleaned up (not just here). For instance, here, by f_features,best, do the authors mean f_features,debiased?

Mel23 commented 8 years ago

In this case f_features,best and f_features,debiased are equivalent, but changing to f_features,debiased may be more clear in this example.

willettk commented 8 years ago

Agreed; we've done pretty thorough evaluations of all the abbrevs, but I'll change this one example.